I'm sure this question has been asked a million times, I've seen and read the threads. I'm still not sure how to do it for OUR family.

May I ask, why do you want them to be in the same guide? Are you having difficulty doing both LHFHG and LHTH, or does one of them not seem to be doing what's right for their age and abilities? It sounds like you've got a good thing going, and it's honestly not always easier to combine. We're in 3 guides with our 3 sons, and it's easy-peasy.amethyst rain wrote:I have four children, all two years appart. I really don't want to end up in four different guides at a time. Currently I have P(6) in LHFHG with the 1st grade extentions; J(4) in LHTH. The other two are 2 and 3 months. I'd like to get P and J into the same guide. Though my problem is that P is doing great in LHFHG and would be very bored if I slowed down and J is not ready for LHFHG yet. Am I just going to have them in different guides? Is there a way to combine them down the road?
I'm sure this question has been asked a million times, I've seen and read the threads. I'm still not sure how to do it for OUR family.
I don't know how many times I nodded my head or thought Amen while reading this, Julie!my3sons wrote:Likewise, if an older child is writing well and ready for written narration instruction (CM said roughly around the age 10), but is paired with a younger sibling not writing, the parent is forced to find something else for the younger child not yet writing to do (often something that is a skill far below this skill that is independent, such as coloring, as they cannot read or write yet). There is nothing wrong with coloring, but then at what point does younger child receive that excellent guided written narration instruction that the older child received? Often they don't, as the older child is always on to the next harder skill, while the younger is still just doing something to "tread water" while the older child finishes. Often the gap widens, and the parent is forced to continue to read everything aloud as the younger child cannot read independently yet. Or, because the older child has continued to move up in guides, even by the time the younger child can read, the reading is so incredibly difficult, that child still cannot read the material - which means either the parent is still reading aloud to the duo (again the older student missing vital independent skills) or the need to separate the two becomes so very obvious at this point as the mom is all but hoarse from reading pages aloud that were never meant to be read aloud by the parent. This can set up a precedence to be teaching to the older child's needs instead of the younger child's needs, and over time the younger child will just need something different. You can see how, because older child never did get to read the material on his own, the parent never did have time freed up to work with the younger child, who really probably needed more instruction earlier on.![]()
I agree this needs to be made available for future reference somehow since I can't be the only one who struggles with the combining or not to combine issue.gotpeace91 wrote:Maybe this should be a sticky...